A year-old should then be able to smoke, drink, defend his country, participate as a juror, vote, create contracts, live independently of parental control, sue and make a will. That ought to put him away for a long time.
Alex Hribal, the year-old knife-wielding student who attacked classmates and a security guard at a Pennsylvania high school last week, has been charged as an adult with four counts of attempted murder and 21 counts of aggravated assault.
Even if we ignore recent research that concludes human brain development continues well into our 20s, there is long-held support that teenage brains are developing throughout adolescence. Why not charge him as a black man?
Two plus two does not equal five. Would you like to stand trial before a jury of twelve year-olds? Calling a child an adult does not — in fact — transform the child into an adult. Sometimes this gets taken to extremes that most would find preposterous: Adults are not children. But a year-old is not an adult, and pressing charges as an adult does not change this fact.
And yet, when a crime is committed — particularly a horrifically violent crime — district attorneys seem hell-bent on charging children as adults. If the concern is that juvenile courts are too lenient on violent offenders, then it would seem that juvenile courts need to change, but as this is probably a monumental task, prosecutors take the easy way out by - in effect - changing the definition of an adult.
Paul Heinz is a writer, musician, and former Wisconsinite who now lives in the Chicago area. If the goal is to ensure that a lengthy sentence be achieved, then why stop at charging Alex Hribal as an adult?
A child is not an adult. According to one study, black men serve jail sentences that are twenty percent longer than white men for the same crime. It could be argued that the age that defines adulthood is somewhat arbitrary and that some leeway should be given to prosecutors to determine whether or not a child has matured to the extent required to be considered an adult.
How about appear in court against a lawsuit filed by a 16 year-old? But black is not white.In this essay I intend to argue that children from ten to eighteen shouldn't be tried for murder as adults.
They should receive a treatment according with their psychological or mental characteristics as I"ll try to show.3/5(8). Juveniles Tried as Adults Essay - There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes.
In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative. Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults Whether to try juveniles as adults or as minors has elicited heightened controversy. The statistics today shows that individuals who commit criminal offenses have not gripped the notion that.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays. Published: Mon, 5 Dec In today’s society, there are many crimes going on.
Essay on Should Teens Be Tried as Adults? Rick Penor 5/12/ | Juvenile Justice: Should children be tried as adults?
Are youth capable of fully understanding the consequences that their actions may cause or are they mentally incapable of processing that information? More about Essay on Should Teens Be Tried as Adults? Essay. Article Rebuttal - Children Should Never Be Tried as Adults Dena Cox BCOM/ March 24, Lynda Sohl Article Rebuttal – Children Should Never Be Tried as Adults Article controversial subject: Should children be tried as adults?
Robert Schwartz is the co-founder of the Juvenile Law Center in and has been the executive director there .Download