So exactly what caused the civil war? This was in contrast to The South which depended on slavery for its predominant agricultural economy. The North and The South did trade a significant amount with each other which brought about mutual benefits.
The agricultural industry meant that unlike cities, owners could have large farms with enormous open fields. Southern states had little desire to embrace manufacturing as businesses were based on low cost labour and so supported the right to sell cotton and purchase manufactured items from any country.
The South argued that each state had rights to secede and leave the Union whenever they wanted — they claimed that states should decide whether they want to pass laws or not, as the states were themselves important individual regions.
The booming manufacturing industry and exports overseas meant that cities were able to grow in northern states and city life becoming the norm of northern society. Instead, manufacturing was the booming industry in this region and goods were made with machines instead of being grown.
It was argued that each state has its own separate identity and so each state should be able to walk away if they want to. As Lincoln stated in his inaugural address, one-eighth of the American population were coloured Cause wars essay that were localised in The South which had particular and powerful interests.
All knew that these interests were somehow Cause wars essay cause of the war. Key questions were posed: From a philosophical perspective, slave ownership was not consistent with republicanism, a philosophy which held unalienable individual rights and liberty Cause wars essay its key central values.
In contrast, Northern states had heavily invested in manufacturing and could not compete with advanced European industries to offer high prices from southern cotton imports and lower prices for manufactured good exports in return. At the time it felt like two separate parts of the world and because each region thought of themselves as different, it was more easy for animosity and conflict to brew between these regions.
People were owned outright, unlike in The North. The war was a result of conflicting ideological, cultural and economic ideas between both regions. As republicanism was the core philosophy of the United States, The Union longed to bring slavery to a gradual end by containing its spread throughout the nation.
Whatever individual motives people had, whether they were based on political ideology or economic motives, millions of men were eager to fight and die.
A number of academic sources seem to suggest that both regions economies were complementary, i. Should the central government have all the power in making decisions? This international conflict is perhaps the most written about and studied piece of United States history.
South Carolina ignored a tax on cotton passed by The North because The South was cotton rich and so South Carolina wondered why they had to listen to such laws that would not affect The North to the same degree, The North hardly growing cotton at all.
In effect, the issue of states rights caused many states to do just that and to form their own group called The Confederacy or The Confederate States of America.
In contrast, The South was a much better region for growing, with a lot of fertile soil, especially along the mineral-rich river basins. The majority of slavery was illegal in The North as it had been outlawed in the 19th century, yet its expansion was rife in southern states.
Slavery Arguably the general consensus is that slavery was the primary cause of the civil war. To put it simply, The North liked producing products and The South liked growing, and so this produced the economic causes of the Civil War.
The brutal and horrific practice of slavery filtered through into all of the causes of the civil war, creating tensions that paved the way for such loss of life, suffering and destruction. The Economy New England states and the climate of The North were largely not suited for farming and so this industry was not embraced.
Even though there were differences of opinion on slavery within Union states at the time and not all the states that held slaves were part of The Confederacy, it was generally clear that The North and The South held opposing views to slavery, leading to political causes of the civil war.
However, it is clear that the interweaving of the slave culture into the southern economy meant that Confederate states would have lost a lot if slavery was taken away from them, and this would have been a great source of tension.
Should states have more power than central government? Cotton, rice, tobacco and the indigo plant were key products grown in largely monoculture farms that required labour from numerous slaves. Some historians debate whether differences in economy between northern and southern regions did help propel the war.
Conclusion and Aftermath Lincoln tried to downplay the slavery side stating that the war was mainly about preserving the union, however, it is clear that the predominant factor that resulted in the civil war was slavery. What rights do states have over the central government?
The South saw Abraham Lincoln as a threat and so argued that they should have the right to secede or leave the United States. This difference in economic interests meant that The North supported tariffs on goods whereas The South demanded a free trade. The South believed that this idea went against their Constitutional rights and that they should be allowed to own slaves if they so desired.
The culture of abolitionists in the Union vs. The rise of chattel slavery meant that slaves could be bought and sold as property and any children the slaves had could become property too. If the livelihoods of the majority of southern businessmen were at stake, it is no wonder they would have gone to extraordinary lengths to defend their interests.
All causes mixed together forming a potent reason to fight for the good of either The Union or The Confederacy.The Cause of An Insignificant War: War of Essay - The War of was one of the most insignificant wars in U.S.
history which despite its failure to accomplish its strategic goals, the country showed the world that the U.S., military could stand up. We can easily remember the Crusades, which were nothing but a war between Christians and Muslims, civil conflicts between Catholics and Protestants in England and Northern Ireland, wars between the Sunnis and the Shiites in Muslim countries.
Observing all this, it is easy to come to the conclusion that religion often causes wars. But personally I. Causes of the Civil War Essay. The Causes Of The Civil War The Political War The North and South fought over politics, mainly the idea of slavery.
Basically the South wanted and needed it and the North did not want it at all. The South was going to do anything they could to keep it. This was the issue that overshadowed all others.
Free Essay: The China today – powerful and ever-growing wasn’t always like this. One major event in history around the mid s that we all have seemed to. In this essay a selection of the more common theories of the cause of interstate war will be analysed using the system, state, sub-state and individual levels.
International relations theories act at the system level of analysis and therefore have significant input into a review of the causes of war.
Definitions of war are as common as war itself, but for the purpose of this essay we will define war broadly as sustained, coordinated violence between political organizations1. There are numerous types of war, but due to the size limits on this essay a focused approach is required, hence this essay will concentrate on the causes of interstate war.5/5(1).Download